What is this? Spoiler I am Tjbot! I'm a solution devised by the genious mods to prevent there ever being a day that hit threads aren't posted! The whole point of my existence is to post a hit thread if one doesn't exist by 12:08am PST. If you see this post, assume that this one is the main post. One of the mod team will clean up existing posts and consolidate once they wake up and get online. As my name indicates, I am a bot. I don't post, nor do I respond to PM's. If you have any problems, send an email to tjbot@ns4t.net or PM Tjololo, he can help out with any issues. Want to make tomorrow's thread? Just go for it!
6 min Title: Follow-up survey on views of the novel coronavirus and COVID-19(~ 10 minutes) | Accept Requester: Isaac Lipkus [AHBH5RRH72TWC] Contact TV: [Hrly=$22.42] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=2.75] [Fast=3.93] [Comm=3.78] [Fair=3.56] [Reviews=33] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 3.00 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 1 Description: This follow-up study asks about your views about the coronavirus and COVID-19 Qualifications: Exc: [244795-244208] DoesNotExist ; Inc: [19-244208] Exists ; Location In US
Title: Strategic Question Decomposition (for qualifications) | Accept Requester: Ai2 Israel [A367KVG928LL2U] Contact TV: [Hrly=$5.10] [Pay=Low] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Excellent] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=1.25] [Fast=1.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=0.00] [Reviews=5] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.55 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 7 Description: Given a question and its answer, write down the steps that should be taken in order to return its answer. Qualifications: Successfully concluded working on strategic question decomposition DoesNotExist ; Location In AU, GB, US; Strategic question decomposer DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95
Possible bonus, took it slow, 25 min. Mine says $5 bonus if it pays out. Not too bad. Title: Individual decision making survey | Accept Requester: MB [A21VUX1HUSRBQ9] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 2.00 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 1 Description: Experiment on decisions for investments and risky lotteries. Opportunity to earn additional bonus between $0.70 and $6.00 based on your decisions and investment and lottery outcomes. Qualifications: Already Participated DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 5000; Masters Exists ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 98; Location EqualTo US
Title: Short decision making task for $1.00 with additional bonus payment up to $3.00 | PANDA Requester: Brent B Moritz [AHBKMMHGOLY1] (Contact) TV: No Reviews TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.00 Duration: 20 days Available: 1 Description: This task will ask you to undertake a decision task. Based on your decision, you can earn a bonus that ranges between $0 and $3.00 Requirements: Masters Exists; Newsvendor DoesNotExist; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US Attention check at very beginning. I missed it, like an idiot
I just got handed 25 rejections from a stack of two penny Amazon Requester room categorization hits (A9 data) . I always thought Amazon requester hits were from Amazon, but maybe not. All I know is I'm never trusting those fuckers again. I don't see how it's possible for them to have been done 'wrong.' They've knocked my approval rate down nearly a tenth of a percentage and I've still got 28 of them pending. I don't even see any way to contact them, to ask why they did it, or plead for reversals. I'm so upset now
Says not to do it if you have seen this survey before or one like it. How about telling us if we did or not? Assign a qualification... EDIT: Looks like they do check your eligibility after accepting. Hopefully. Pretty quick. Around 5 min. Title: Understanding data visualizations | Accept Requester: DecisionResearch Lab [A32XN4TF9CXR6Y] Contact TV: [Hrly=$19.65] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.06] [Fast=4.06] [Comm=3.86] [Fair=4.63] [Reviews=176] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.50 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 1 Description: In this task, you will be shown some data visualizations and be asked questions about how those visualizations might have been generated. This task is part of a research project about how data are perceived. This talk should take about 5-10 minutes. Your answers will be manually reviewed for quality before the payout will be released. Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 99; Location EqualTo US
That is so upsetting. They don't reply anyway from what I see in the reviews even if you contact them.
I remembered working for these people in the past and not having any problems, or I wouldn't have touched the things. The hits were so simple that it's literally impossible for me to have gotten any 'wrong.' And still... If I could get my hands around the throat of the asshole who rejected these, I would cheerfully squeeze until their eyes popped like pimples. Turking is bad for my mental health.
I got some kinda sign up page for a website or something asking for first & last name, dob, email. This is against TOS. So I pondered what to do. So I proceed to enter my worker IDs instead of any personal info. Hit submit and it error-ed out. So I decided to switch to another browser and bingo it takes me to a normal survey. Avoid Chrome. 35 min. Title: Help researchers understand COVID in America! (Harvard/Northeastern survey, 15-30 minutes) | Accept Requester: Lazer Lab [A4JZBXM4JSOF0] Contact TV: [Hrly=$25.16] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.14] [Fast=3.96] [Comm=2.84] [Fair=3.92] [Reviews=46] [ToS=1] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 6.00 Duration: 7:00:00 Available: 1 Description: A university survey designed by researchres at Harvard and Northeastern to help researchers understand how COVID-19 has affected people in the United States. Qualifications: COVID September DoesNotExist ; COVID September Small States DoesNotExist ; Location EqualTo US
Not sure if this was supposed to be this short, but I got a code. Less than a minute. Title: survey about apps | Accept Requester: STQ-Surveys [A388Z19SP010HT] Contact TV: [Hrly=$22.73] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.94] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=3.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=38] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.90 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 4 Description: - Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location EqualTo US
Yep, my bonus for that hit was just over $5 and it took me about 20 minutes. I did it at a very lazy pace. It's still up for those who have not done it yet.
That $7 Postlab visual memory hit is buggy. The control keys weren't doing what they were supposed to, so I had to return mine--then I noticed that those keys HAD worked for some people, who made it all the way to the end of the experiment (takes a half an hour), only to find that the submit button wasn't working on theirs. The experiment may be working right for some people, but try it at your peril.
Did it last Fri and returned it for the same reason. Couldn't get the brightness to work too well. The orientation however worked just fine. Only did the 1st round and was glad to get out of this torture. Myopia went through the same thing as well.