hmm, seems broken Title: Graphical Perception Study | PANDA Requester: HARGvis MTurk [A29C1ZUT7MPK08] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Answer questions about cars and movies based on visualizations. Time: 15 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US
B did you see the layout for wiktor this morning? Video not embeded, have to click the youtube link before the questions appear.
Oh come on, don't you want to do them for $.10? After all, you can sit and watch tv in your underwear! You should practically be paying her for the pleasure of doing them!
You missed or are missing the 1.00 batch. Takes one minute each. Done 20 so far in about 25 minutes and have another que full and they keep coming in. I don't have any idea about the 10 cent batch.
Everything gets a pay cut if they stay around long enough. They started at .05 but were .02 last week.
Bah, anyone wanna pm me the panda? I only see the $.10 ones. Apparently, scraper is failing me or when they did show I was still trying to clear my queue of 5's before they expired.
Occasionally a survey has questions to assess financial knowledge. They seem straightforward to me, and I took for granted knowing the answers. One survey reported the average respondent gets only 55% correct. These seem like things all people should know so I took the liberty to explain the answers to common questions, not so you can pass a test but to benefit you in your personal finances… http://mturkforum.com/showthread.php?34565-Financial-Basics&p=1608629#post1608629
Cool post. Good to see I've been answering pretty much all those right (although a lot of good it does me, since I have a mountain of debt to pay off before I can invest a dime).
Is anyone else still having panda issues where you can't add one to TM because of the new Why? format thinggiemadoodle? I thought the updated TM fixed it buuuuut nope.
Requesters post these questions to see if workers know these answers. You are basically revealing answers to survey contents thus messing up their data. Anyone agree?
No, it's basic financial knowledge people should know. People educating themselves doesn't mess with unrelated research. Maybe a researcher will study why a growing number of online workers have greater basic financial knowledge than the general population.