Title: 20- minute survey on new products purchase Requester: helen [AYPAX0JCT7U2P] (TO) TO Ratings: ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 5.00 Communicativity ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 5.00 Generosity ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 5.00 Fairness ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 6 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please take this approximately 20- minute survey Time: 60 minutes Reward: $0.60 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 100, HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95, Location is US about 5 minutes.
Title: Very Shot (about 1 minute) survey about different kinds of foods Requester: ConsumerDecision [A3PVN2L6G2K9R7] (TO) TO Ratings: ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 0.00 Communicativity ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 4.60 Generosity ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 5.00 Fairness ⚖⚖⚖⚖⚖ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 8 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Quick survey 1 minute Easy Consumer Evaluation Time: 10 minutes Reward: $0.10 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US less than a minute.
For anyone doing these Burch HITs still out there. Are you guys marking "X" for abbreviations? I know he says to for acronyms but not sure about abbrevs.
I'm actually marking E, not sure which one is right Also I think the checks are those goups that are "a__b, a__c, a__d" For example, marches__troubles: not related, marches__walk: is more specific than, marches__marching: is related in some other way It doesn't get more checky than that to me
I had that happen a couple times (yes, I recopied and pasted it, because I'm a little obsessive), and it took on about the 3rd time. As far as I can tell I had the correct url the whole time...
Yeah, I can see it going either way. I sent him a message when it first came up, so we'll see. I agree with the check ones. Seem pretty blatant.
There are exactly one group per hit that follow that check format, i'm acing those and getting kinda lazy on the rest We got a pony rapping on tiny chat.com/turktime