Title: Survey: What policy issues are important to your generation? Requester: Stella Rouse [AP27RLDE9UHSK] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.34 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.40 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.38 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.43 Promptness Number of Reviews: 85 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Take a 15 minute survey about the policy issues that are important to you and your age cohort. Earn $1.25 for your time. Time: 3 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US
Not really helpful, for your money situation, but if you have a smartphone you can download the serve app to check if your funds are there. Also, there are settings that you can change (I think if you log into your account online) where they will send you an text/email when your deposit onto the card happens.
Title: Answer a 5-minute survey about your social media use and privacy management behaviors. Requester: Philip Wu [ACSCAPRX4AUHN] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: This is an academic study on people's information disclosure on social media. You must be an active social media user to take part in this survey. Time: 24 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted; Total approved HITs is not less than 500; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US
We have been getting quite bit of new members and this is a reminder to others: It is NOT okay to discuss anything about ANY survey or study other than basically that it is available, how long it took, whether it was worth doing, if it has writing in it, what the TO is, whether you got paid / rejected, etc. Any content of ANY study or survey, the part where you click on the survey link, even the most mundane detail, is simply not allowed. These are being done by graduate students with very limited budgets coming to us as Turkers to get unbiased data. Any discussion of ANY detail of the survey or study runs the risk of corrupting that data. Certainly no talks of AC (attention checks) or why you weren't qualified for a survey. You cannot discuss screeners at all. Why you qualified or didn't qualify. The screener is there for a reason - to screen people out without actually telling them what they are looking for to prevent people from lying to get in. Revealing where the code is at is part of survey content. You can say whether the code is there or not, but that's it.
I mean God Forbid we're helpful around here. Man I miss the old days of this place before Hitler started her reign of terror. #RWSteinf4lyfe
Title: Explore our app and answer a brief survey about it Requester: MAD Labs [AH3L9684FUCS6] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 2.80 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.30 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.38 Promptness Number of Reviews: 32 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Test an app during few minutes and answer some questions Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Location is US ~8 minutes
This is what HE used to say. He used to repeat this over and over in the forums. That hasn't changed.
Title: Personality assessment Requester: VisualDNA [A34QOA2NXQ31W2] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 1.00 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.52 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.87 Promptness Number of Reviews: 37 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Fun and engaging personality assessment Time: 2 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $6.00 Qualifications: Re-test is 100; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US About 45 minutes if I remember correctly.
I am not impressed with OCMP's decision to make most of their qual hits nonpaid. Seriously, how many of them would work for free while learning a new task at work. I hate when people treat this like it's a joke and not an actual job.