So I'm a little confused with panda crazy. Is there a way to accept any hit posted by a certain requester?
Title: Social judgments(~ 6 minutes) | PANDA Requester: PLEEP Lab [A1423FO0G8Z6D] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.26] [Fair: 4.97] [Comm: 4.33] [Fast: 5.00] Description: Read two short descriptions of social interactions and make a set of judgments for each. Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.35 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Exc: [33355-32766] has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90; Location is one of: US; 3.5 minutes.
Title: 45 second - Academic survey | PANDA Requester: Alican [A26AFZAPFDTHIT] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A] Description: short survey Time: 5 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.12 Qualifications: None It was 50 seconds. I want a refund.
Good question. I think it needs an URL or a panda. It can't just accept any HIT from a requester I think. TM lets us know when a requester posts but not accept them. I assume it's the same?
I looked into it and I wasn’t able to find a record indicating why you might have been blocked and so I have unblocked your account. This is a department account which has had a number of managers over the years so I can’t provide any additional information, but I believe you’re right about the soft blocks in the past. Thank you for your interest in our studies. Regards, John Sperger Senior Research Coordinator Operations, Information and Decisions Department
Hmm for some reason I thought that was one of it's selling points. I use TM a lot to search by requester. So you can just use the search function and it only pandas the first hit it finds?
I did not turk much from Nov - Jan. When I started up again, I noticed people talking about Panda Crazy. Do people seem to think that its much better than TM? I am curious what the main benefit is.
It has a better way of organizing your Pandas. I haven't gone into it deep to find more about it yet. There's info on it. http://pandacrazy.allbyjohn.com/ Panda Crazy is a script which helps with the organization and grabbing hits as fast as possible. Now it has evolved to do more than just a panda. It can do a pantha which helps with throttled batches a bit. It can also do a search on the requester for any hits they drop. With the GoHam button you can have it grab hits as fast as possible once something drops. It will also slow down if it starts getting PRE's which could help out when you're trying to work from your queue. There is also list of your hits in your current queue on the bottom so you can always know what's in your queue.
Title: Research survey about risk and uncertainty. 10-15 minutes for $1.50 | PANDA Requester: The Wharton School [ABIUW8FBC3EE7] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.10 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.91 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.65 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.61 Promptness Number of Reviews: 383 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: In this survey, you will play a 10 round game about hurricane insurance and then answer survey questions. You will also have the chance to earn bonus payment based on your decisions. Time: 45 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Hurricane Insurance Past Participant has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is one of: US-AL, US-FL, US-LA, US-MS, US-NC, US-NJ, US-NY, US-SC, US-TX, US-VA Woo Hoo first Whalton School HIT in 5 years. And it only too me 9 minutes kiddos! EDIT: Already approved!!! Also approved just now that $4 Dr. Rachel Smith study!
Title: $0.45 for 4-5 minute academic survey | PANDA Requester: Prof. Dan Bartels [AR6MXRKDX6EXF] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.33] [Fair: 4.90] [Comm: 4.34] [Fast: 4.81] Description: We're currently recruiting participants to complete a 3-5 minute survey Time: 45 minutes HITs Available: 27 Reward: $0.45 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 96; Location is US; 3 minutes.
Title: Trump Tweet Opinions for Liberals | PANDA Requester: Jen Golbeck [A3CDF6AT8KGAW7] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.67 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.38 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.20 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.80 Promptness Number of Reviews: 19 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Score your opinion of Trump's tweets. Requires our Political HIT Qualification (click Requester ID to find this qualifying HIT)) Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 733 Reward: $0.08 Qualifications: Political Qualification is 1
Title: Trump Tweet Opinions for Conservatives | PANDA Requester: Jen Golbeck [A3CDF6AT8KGAW7] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.67 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.38 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.20 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.80 Promptness Number of Reviews: 19 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Score your opinion of Trump's tweets. Requires our Political HIT Qualification (click Requester ID to find this qualifying HIT)) Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 733 Reward: $0.08 Qualifications: Political Qualification is 2
I took the qual test for these and at the end it said I was qualified for the task. I never got a qualification for it and it won't let me accept these hits. I don't know what's up.
I'm very liberal but I'm distancing myself from those fauxprogressives who are having a meltdown over Trump and are still mad that their Satanic Queen wasn't installed as our dictator as planned by the Bilderberg Group. What I'm trying to say is I feel torn about doing these because I'm not going to give typical liberal answers. I find Trump entertaining and don't really loathe him (though I'm not like he's gonna save us all either). But I'm not really conservative either. Ugh!!!
They'd probably like diverse view points though, even from people from the same political party. Are you qualified for these? I still can't accept them for some reason.
Looks like they are tweets from just Donald Trump and not random people on twitter. At least the one I'm qualled for is