5/2 Monday Finding Hits Out of this Universe . . .

Discussion in 'Great HITs' started by D1G1TALFOX, May 1, 2016.

?

Would you rather have...

  1. President Trump

    34 vote(s)
    79.1%
  2. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Trump

    9 vote(s)
    20.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lucas

    Lucas User

    Title: Answer a 5-7 minute survey about charitable donations. HIT excludes Workers who have answered my survey on charitable donations. | PANDA
    Requester: Tiffany Vu [A2Y42OI44AF16X] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    3.67 Communicativity
    4.69 Generosity
    5.00 Fairness
    4.55 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 17
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Answer a 5-7 minute survey about charitable donations. HIT excludes Workers who have answered my survey on charitable donations.
    Time: 5 hours
    Hits Available: 1
    Reward: $0.60
    Qualifications: Charitable Donations has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US
     
  2. Flora

    Flora Admin Staff Member

    Title: 8 Minute Survey for $0.80
    Requester: The Wharton School [ABIUW8FBC3EE7] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    4.07 Communicativity
    3.93 Generosity
    4.63 Fairness
    4.58 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 341
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Complete a 8 Minute Survey for $0.80
    Time: 30 minutes
    Hits Available: 1
    Reward: $0.80
    Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
     
  3. Lucas

    Lucas User

    Title: Brief Survey About Your Finances | PANDA
    Requester: IL Team [A3HK1TA36RVPL4] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    1.00 Communicativity
    4.55 Generosity
    5.00 Fairness
    4.89 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 30
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: 5-7 minute study for $2.00
    Time: 60 minutes
    Hits Available: 1
    Reward: $2.00
    Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90; Location is US
     
  4. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    2slow4u

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Lucas

    Lucas User

    2 minutes
     
  6. Hajime

    Hajime User

    Thank you Lucas.
     
  7. D1G1TALFOX

    D1G1TALFOX Banned

    Sent . . .:cool:
     
  8. Lucas

    Lucas User

    Appreciate it. I'll be sure to post plenty of hits for you.
     
  9. Rufus

    Rufus User

    This is the part where he triples the donation and sends you back the original amount and an additional 50%, right?
     
  10. 657 Giphy to go....
     
  11. On the bright side at least that is a option for you.
     
  12. True, and I upped my goal once other hits starting pouring in, so it will end well no matter what.
     
  13. krishnalynn

    krishnalynn Member

    [redacted]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2016
  14. Flora

    Flora Admin Staff Member

    I redacted your post because we are not allowed to post why we were or were not screened out.

    Here's the forum rules for any new members that just joined us.


    It is NOT okay to discuss anything about ANY survey or study other than basically that it is available, how long it took, whether it was worth doing, if it has writing in it, what the TO is, whether you got paid / rejected, etc.

    Any content of ANY study or survey, the part where you click on the survey link, even the most mundane detail, is simply not allowed.

    These are being done by graduate students with very limited budgets coming to us as Turkers to get unbiased data. Any discussion of ANY detail of the survey or study runs the risk of corrupting that data.

    No talks of AC (attention checks) or why you weren't qualified for a survey. You cannot discuss screeners at all. Why you qualified or didn't qualify. The screener is there for a reason - to screen people out without actually telling them what they are looking for to prevent people from lying to get in. Revealing where the code is at is part of survey content. You can say whether the code is there or not, but that's it.
     
  15. Flora can you redact me. It's been to [redacted].
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2016
  16. pdrmturk

    pdrmturk User

    Holder out of his mind at that price.
     
  17. TotalBabe

    TotalBabe Verified Leader

    This is too long for the pay (about 8 mins.). However, they say there will be a follow-up that pays $1.50 and only takes 5 mins.

    Title: Survey on Current Events - Wave 1 (5/2/2016)
    Requester: Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab [A3OSXTUM1QEXNY] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    3.78 Communicativity
    3.74 Generosity
    4.43 Fairness
    4.35 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 393
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Survey has Two parts. First part takes 10 minutes and pays $.50, second part takes 5 minutes and pays $1.50
    Time: 60 minutes
    Hits Available: 120
    Reward: $0.50
    Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
     
  18. Lucas

    Lucas User

    Title: Generate ideas for an interesting problem! | PANDA
    Requester: CMU-HCII-research [A194ARYB57C6LH] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    4.00 Communicativity
    3.82 Generosity
    4.33 Fairness
    4.26 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 42
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Spend 15 minutes using our online tool to brainstorm ideas for an interesting problem
    Time: 2 hours
    Hits Available: 1
    Reward: $1.50
    Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US
     
  19. I love women in powerful positions lol
     
  20. [redacted]...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page