Medcrowd

Discussion in 'MedCrowd' started by RWStein, Feb 7, 2013.

?

Would It Be Better If Medcrowd Posted Multiple Batches Throughout The Day?

  1. No - Keep It The Way it Is.

    69 vote(s)
    48.3%
  2. Yes - But WITHOUT Separate Qualifications For Each Batch Time

    46 vote(s)
    32.2%
  3. Yes - But WITH Separate Qualificatioins For Each Batch Time

    14 vote(s)
    9.8%
  4. No Preference

    14 vote(s)
    9.8%
  1. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    Review moderation should be going up now.

    ~ Mark L.
     
  2. There are a few where they violate multiple things and it's hard to determine the best reason. (Not a question, just an observation.)
     
  3. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    Yes, it may verywell be the case in some of the examples. Just choose the one that stands out the most I guess haha.

    ~ Mark L.
     
  4. Jak

    Jak User

    What should we put if they complain about the office service and mention that they never got to see the doctor? Would that be considered a non-patient?
     
  5. leftfield

    leftfield User

    "crappy insurance" is that vulgarity?
     
  6. I wouldn't put it under vulgarity or profanity, but I'd check "Inappropriate".
     
  7. Just hit something similar to this myself and I'm a bit unsure too.
     
  8. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    I would say inappropriate.
     
  9. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    They are allowed to comment about the office the doctor owns or is a part of. Non-patient is when someone other than the patient is reviewing the practice.

    ~ Mark L.
     
  10. A valid negative review up until the last sentence where the doctor is referred to as a "quack" probably would be inappropriate, right?
     
  11. Jak

    Jak User

    What do we mark a review that gets cut off mid sentence?
     
  12. alian1980

    alian1980 User

    1) Patient is praising the Dr. but is equally unhappy with other reviewers and using the words like 'idiots' for them. Should this be marked as Profanity or ​Inappropriate

    2) Shortest review - 'Shitt', where would this fit?
     
  13. From what I remember, cut-offs are still okay as long as the visible content doesn't violate any other rules.
     
  14. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    Well its all about context. As long as they are explaning their experience and in doing so feel the doctor is a quack thats ok. but if they are just saying the guy is a quack then thats inapporpriate.

    Make sense?

    ~ Mark L.
     
  15. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    Just flag it as you normally would based on what you can see of it.

    ~ Mark L.
     
  16. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    1) inappropriate.

    2) profanity.

    ~ Mark L.
     
  17. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    ** PLEASE NOTE **

    The FACILITY / URGENT CARE step that is going up right now (contact info + hours) DO NOT USE LINE2 IN YOUR CONSIDERATION. DO NOT PROVIDE LINE2 BACK IN YOUR ANSWER.

    Thank you,

    ~ Mark L.
     
  18. Oh, well then I got that one wrong. Sorry! I went with "inappropriate/unsure" because of the name-calling. There's a bit of a fine line between a valid negative review and just taking angry pot shots at a doctor sometimes and it can be hard to figure out what to do.
     
  19. Medcrowd

    Medcrowd Verified Requester

    If it forces an answer for line 2, just put n/a

    ~ Mark L.
     
  20. AHHH! I can't decide which batch to work on!
     

Share This Page