Haven't done those Yes/Nos in years, but they are super-safe. They'll approve. Ads? What Ads? (ublock, hint hint)
Only seems to happen before i login, but good lord it assaults me like crazy until I login. And thank you!
Title: Survey about bets (2min) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: FutureMindLab [AY1IJ23H07UPL] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.95] [Fast: 4.58] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 26] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $6.50/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 100% of 1] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $0.20 Duration: 60 minutes Available: 1 Description: Not Available Requirements: Total approved HITs is greater than 1000; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US
Yeah, when I saw them I knew they were safe. I am just impatient. 5k is right around the corner! Just need another safe batch and hopefully smooth sailing once i hit 5000. So excited.
They haven't changed their fonts, and your settings are in your profile, not in the program. Roll your scroll wheel while holding the CTRL key
Possible future survey screener Title: One question about your family/living arrangement | PANDA Requester: Lisa Jobe-Shields [A35YJYW8Y00T97] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 0.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 2 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: screener Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90; Total approved HITs is greater than 50; Location is US
They tend to repost few times with the same panda. Then they screen you out once you've taken it so you won't have to worry about doing that one particular one again. Speaking of which, here's another that just posted. Title: Investigating Semantic Representations(~ 17 minutes) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Dermot Lynott [A325L0H6Q5L71I] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.68] [Fast: 4.65] [Comm: 3.86] [Fair: 4.76] [Reviews: 27] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $16.12/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 100% of 1] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: A multiple choice survey about common words Time: 1 hour 20 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.25 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 97; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1; Location In US; Exc: [61396-60807] DoesNotExist ;
Did you send them a message? Can't hurt. That isn't right of them to screen you out at the end rather than state it up front.
Title: Categorization | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Kevin Munger [A1C4RN2U3PO1RX] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: Not Available Reward: $0.02 Duration: 60 minutes Available: 394 Description: Not Available Requirements: Masters has been granted
To be honest they probably didnt expect anyone over 70 to take the survey so they set up that range to filter out any fake survey answers
Or they just forgot to add a statement at the beginning. Some of these studies are constructed with spit and bubble gum.
On another note, anybody have any batch recommendations to push me from 4400 hits to 5000? Was gonna do p9r or productrnr but last I remember they could be iffy on rejections.
Oh yeah Flora, I forgot to tell you I tried the new apple crisp at Arby's today and it was sooo good. I only had a bite though because I had bought a cookie to take home.
Usually there is something but weekends are slow and I don't see anything really good to build numbers with. There used to be A9 people do for numbers. Batches like that post here and there.