Can't Find Awesome HITs? 12/14 Money Money Monday!

Discussion in 'Great HITs' started by nanaki254, Dec 13, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. everbuddy

    everbuddy User

    fitness again
     
  2. B

    B User

    Luo Yu
     
  3. lovecat

    lovecat User

    Dang, went to smoke and missed the last fitness....
     
  4. lovecat

    lovecat User

    Title: $1.20 cents for 12-Minute Academic Study
    Requester: Prof. Stephen Atlas [A2RDQ53BYDOJ4T] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    5.00 Communicativity
    4.22 Generosity
    4.50 Fairness
    4.62 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 18
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: We are recruiting participants to complete surveys. This one takes about 12 minutes and pays $1.20
    Time: 60 minutes
    Hits Available: 40
    Reward: $1.20
    Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 0; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 97; Location is US
     
  5. B

    B User

    lol sergey.

    These are so terrible.
     
  6. Morrisa

    Morrisa User

    Aren't they all, though? Well, minus those quick tag hits.
     
  7. B

    B User

    YOUR SCORES
    Level 0: 8
    Level 1: 7
    Level 2: 41

    Damn, crushed it.
     
  8. everbuddy

    everbuddy User

    Damn. I was happy with my 33 til I saw yours :p
     
  9. B

    B User

    No, 99 percent of his wiktor hits are great. Except the garbage ones he just put up now. The 1.50 ones are good and the video ones where you click relevance that were like a quarter each. Over the summer he had a hit for a week for wiktors that paid over 1.00 a minute that usually lasted about an hour.
     
  10. B

    B User

    I got 3 0's last week a few times. Just got lucky today I guess. It's definitely easier than it has been and I'm doing something different although we can't talk about it.
     
  11. squirrel78

    squirrel78 User

    Jesus, school messed with my mind. I can't remember how to make anything work.
     
  12. Morrisa

    Morrisa User

    Okay okay I meant the non-qualled ones! Most are terrible to me. I dunno.
     
  13. Turkinhard

    Turkinhard User

    Good morning
    [​IMG]
    Time for coffee.
     
  14. ladylilac

    ladylilac User

    Title: Complete a 2-3 minute survey--quick payment!
    Requester: CB Researcher [A2JU7B5WFNY9DN] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    1.00 Communicativity
    3.57 Generosity
    4.83 Fairness
    5.00 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 31
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Complete a 2-3 minute survey--quick payment!
    Time: 20 minutes
    Hits Available: 33
    Reward: $0.30
    Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US, EM December has not been granted


    Easy. Watch the instructions for the code.
     
  15. Lori1985

    Lori1985 User

    These sergeys weren't bad last week when they only had 1 click. He doubled the work but didn't double the pay.
     
  16. WCH

    WCH User

    I'm with you. Some of the Sergey batches have been gems, but most of them are terrible IMO. I don't even like the trash hits that everybody is going nuts over.

    Really, we can extend that to Google hits in general. I dislike most of them.
     
  17. HLP Lab "Self paced reading (office emails)" for $2.00 was an easy 4 minutes if it shows up again.
     
  18. Morrisa

    Morrisa User

    Yeah same. I think the only Google-y ones I do with any sort of regularity are Virals. Everything else I just kind of ignore.
     
  19. B

    B User

    Anyone have amazon echo? Thinking of getting one. Just not sure if I'd use it that much?
     
  20. WCH

    WCH User

    My parents have one and they like it enough. It's kind of glitchy though. Last time I was over, they said "Alexa, play Bob Segar." The damn thing started playing Bone Thugs, lol. Another time, my dad said "Alexa, you're a dumbass" and it responded "I'm sorry, I'll try to do better next time." So, it's fun, even if it's a bit glitchy.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 14, 2015
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page