Title: Answer a survey about email messages. Requester: jeshin7 [ATS2GNUFMKYKW] (TO) Description: Read three hypothetical email messages, and answer questions! Reward: $0.40 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2E3PVP3TVOK54FQ264YQKOZK2ZT14Q [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size] 1min45sec
Clearmeter Launch Pages View a HIT in this group Requester: ▼ ClearMeter HIT Expiration Date: Nov 28, 2012 (23 hours 58 minutes) Time Allotted: 60 minutes Reward: $1.00 HITs Available: 1 https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=260LVCNHMVHVOJ0ZLUB2E4J8DOS02L
https://www.mturk.com/mturk/accept?...ehtPeqT8CS8AFlmgE8=&/accept.x=25&/accept.y=15 Answer a survey about email messages. Requester: jeshin7 Reward: $0.40 per HIT took two minutes, if that
I had to post about an experience I just had on a hit by Ignite Media Solutions. It was a HIT where you have to play the message left by a customer, and transcribe their name and address. The first part of the message she says "DO NOT CALL ANYMORE!", the she spells it out. Then I played the address part and she spells out "GO TO HELL!". I needed to hear something funny and I got it!
Read Articles and Write Draft Tweets (Earn an additional $0.10 to $0.50 on Approval) Requester: Chirpsy Reward: $0.40 per HIT HITs Available: 2 Duration: 2 hours sorry no link. I accepted before I could get it
I've been looking for them all day and haven't seen them. They were having problems earlier so maybe they are not posting quals today.
I agree, the first question is not enough because then it still makes it hard to answer the rest of the questions because I have no clue, like you said, the query is bad, vague. Comment box would have helped.
Breaking up scenes in porn. After about 10 of them, I'm averaging 2.5 minutes a HIT at .25 so it's not horrible if you need to fill some time or get up your hit count.....or you just like porn. Great TO https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview...er=raINC&hitId=2XKSCXKNQY2RCMWFIQME8HR2ODDP0W
yeah. how can i judge if i would be happy with the results if i'm not sure of the query? and you can still tell what a query is getting at, but at the same time it's still formed badly for how search engines work... anyway, i guess if anyone's feeling sketchy about these, just return the odd ones and do the really straightforward ones... EDIT: here's a great example of an odd one: Imagine that you submitted the following query on a search engine: %D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%AC%D9%85%D9%87 lolwut
Title: Browser Extension Testing (for Shopping) - Test then Answer a Short 8 Question Survey Requester: NextGen Shopping LLC [A1G8WLM1PJ9YNX] (TO) Description: Shop online? Help test the workflow and user experience of a shopping related web browser extension with this 8 question survey. Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 50, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2PBXCNHMVHVKKHEL41T77J7ELY113W [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size] You can do 3 of them, quick and easy
i'm getting faster at those too now! i just wish the videos would load faster for me. if i would have no problems when they're loading or when I fast forward, i could be flying through those.
I am with you, makes doing this dealable. if you are in a hurry and not into the convo then just skim ahead. HIT spam looks nothing like conversation. Honestly though I think the best thing that would solve everything is a active chat room to the side of the forum window. best of everything problem solved. stuff everything in a frame and done.
unfortunately, shoutbox-style chats can be a huge drain on bandwidth, but there might be better options. i'm pretty happy with the way this thread works, except that it keeps me from going anywhere else in the forum, but that's my fault. and everybody else's fault too!
Business Card Data Entry Requester: Coder of Web Apps Reward: $0.05 per HIT anyone got any experience with this requester? not a bad rate compared to oscar