Title: Rate faces on trust, threat, and age. Requester: Laura Harrison [A2VSBIZQXKAKR6] (TO) Description: In this task, you rate photographs of people on their age and whether they're trustworthy or threatening. This survey take about 45 minutes. You must be fluent in English and living in the United States to complete this HIT. Reward: $5.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 99, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2FH56XBAT2D8KB32BWUQAJG6W5U044 [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]' WOMEN ONLY
Discussing HITS is fine. We went over this yesterday. If you can see the content before accepting the hit, and/or the hit does not lead to a consent form, then it is public knowledge, quals or not, to be discussed. Reviews/tweets/categorization tasks are public knowledge anyways so I don't see a problem with it. Now if this was a fake review in an university study, that is a different story.
I swear to god I will give someone $5 to transfer over the rest of my hitDB so I can go to bed...... only like 10k total, but I'm sure I already did at least half (dem batchez)........
Bad. Very bad. Stultifyingly, dumbfoundingly, mind numbingly bad. ^ pretty much describes every topic that gets reiterated 100's of times on this forum weekly.
Discussion of how we should rate an entry isn't fine come on now. All of us saying we should put X as our answer so we can get a group bonus isn't what the requester wants and you know it.
I don't know or see any talk about a bonus (since I'm not even doing that hit). I just see someone posting a tweet response. It's no different from me posting an RnR picture and asking what does everyone think.
Haven't seen them post in a couple days, maybe tired of trying to find the same 2 movies over and over for 4 dollars.
Thanks for your two cents, maybe if you were doing the HIT you'd feel different. Requester's don't want as tag teaming the HITs that's a fact.
Im doing the hit, I wanted a valid opinion because one of the questions out of the 32 ive done confused me. Don't think im killing the data one bit.
Of which I still don't see happening. I just see people posting amusing reviews, maybe asking people's opinions on an ambiguous one. I don't see people saying "Oh everyone should mark this as ___"
The requesters want thorough accurate work. No one is trying to subvert that. Calm yourself. Learning what is slightly or moderately positive is only going to improve someone's work and help out the requester.
"tag teaming"........ "so we can get a group bonus"......HUH?......folks are just tossing out some funny lines to keep themselves occupied while they turk...Gee Whizzzzzzzzzzz!