I've grown to like these, and nobody does them. Requester is cool too, sent me a message with bonus of how good they are. Feelsgoodman.
Are you sure you used ctrl a and not just double click? Double click wont highlight the entire code. Use a simple ahk to make it easier 1::^a 2::^c 3::^v
Nice, globals are coming soon. Finally some daily work will be up for me. Thats my only decent qual :rolleyes:
Yeah, I do ones that are a little "edgy" but still well within the rules. Makes things more fun rather than another "the dog plays with a ball" tale.
Yeah, I'm 200 deep and making 'em up in 1 minute or so. Made my shit day to 80$ PE. Getting kinda burnt out, I'm gonna do the dog plays with the ball. Haven't done animals.
Title: Comparing Smiles between Computer Generated Faces | PANDA Requester: kgmtv [AZZHFAAQA0UT5] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.43 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 1.88 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.29 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.61 Promptness Number of Reviews: 34 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Mutiple-choice questions to compare 2 computer generated faces based on how much they are smiling. Each HITs contain 5 pairs of images. Time: 10 minutes Hits Available: 473 Reward: $0.04 Qualifications: HIT submission rate (%) is greater than 50; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 96; Location is US Has anyone done these before? They seem great. I started yesterday and they haven't been approved yet.
I used ctrl A, and everything is highlighted. I manually highlighted too, and tried incognito. Nothing works. I'm not concerned about the batch, I was just trying to get it to submit, so I don't get a hard block over a nickel. I'd be pissed.
Good, Boone, I thought JR needed shooting.In fact, I thought the whole lot of 'em needed shooting. But that's Dallas for ya.
The last TO review is concerning....I did just try 1 and it was ok except for the mandatory reason comment