I would have acted in the EXACT manner he did in this scenario. What people don't seem to realize is that having a valid point/opinion does not entitle you to an unruly takeover of whatever you feel like. Simple.
He made a really insensitive comment to one of the accusers of Bill Cosby. In an interview. That's not excusable. I could care less about his rather trashy sexual practices (or at least what Gawker and gossip outlets report on them), but his on-air behavior is fine to judge him on IMO.
If America was actually calling for the head of any news person, I doubt O'Reilly would still have a head. Comparing Don Lemon to O'Reilly is like comparing the local pre-school bully to ISIS.
Agreed. He got a free pass on that when he should not have. Other things he does are a matter of personal preference (like ignoring that girl in the clip a few posts up) but treating a guest on your show that way is not cool. He also is a hypocrite because he wrote about his own history of sexual abuse but then says ridiculous things to someone who is bringing similar allegations.
Who cares? I was talking about him specifically. If there's some kind of "let's hate Don Lemon" fad, I've never heard of it. I'm specifically referring to things he's said/done over the last 3-4 years that have personally offended me. I honestly have no knowledge of what these other "transgressions" are that have people so hyped against him. If they're anything like the things I've witnessed, though, I can empathize.
I didn't even know about this. Any of it. The accuser comment or his personal life. No clue. His on-air fuckery goes way back and I've been flipping the channel on his ass ever since.
I don't know how he kept his job after this... http://gawker.com/don-lemon-gives-cosby-rape-accuser-tip-for-not-getting-1660499698 And I also could care less about his hoish activities. For all I know Megyn Kelly does the same stuff... But no one (including Bill O'Reilly) makes offensive comments like this.
Were the Intrones .10 before or did people just get a lot of bonuses and that's why the TO is so good?
I can't even get these hits to submit, and I wonder how you got a 68? I seem to have the qual. based on not having any score? Seems like it'd be pretty easy to lose if you have to match 80% or higher anyway...
They had a qualification test on one of their hits a few weeks ago that I got that score. I don't know why that prevents anybody who took that test from doing these hits. It's unfair
I couldn't get mine to submit either. Maybe a blessing in disguise. I hate counting on flaky turkers to answer the same way I do.