Discussion in 'Great HITs' started by er111a, Jan 2, 2013.
Did Movie Enquirer not post any hits this week?
Nothing fun goign on anymore afaik
Welcome to the club!
Jesus Christ the review ones went quick.
nope. they'll probably be back next week when stuff is back to normal
What brain dead individual is responsible for putting up this latest Rubin instructor hits? I had three hit that were the same course with different sections. MAC 2233.0002 MAC2233.0003, ect. So now they only want the name of the instructor for that specific class and not all classes offered? And zero communication with workers about the changes to the hit format. These people are morons.
No, it says LAWN VAC right on the fucking cover. Someone needs to facepalm themselves with a handful of broken glass.
You truly are the Movie Enquirer girl, every time they are mentioned I know you'll be commenting soon.
Today was my first time doing them and it sounds like the prior format was a lot easier to do.
What the actual fuck people?
lol they're some of my favorites despite those two erroneous (I say they're erroneous because they won't tell me what I did wrong!) rejections i've gotten the last 2 times i've done them.
lol that's so true I was expecting the answer to come from bredeanf when I posted the question
I would not say the other ones were easier, but these have had some weird ones come through like the examples that have been shown here. That is pretty normal to have some that people just put random stuff, but I think everyone is still a little worried about putting class not offered or this is not a real class in the comments at the moment, because of the rejections that happened the other night to those two people.
Edit: I went ahead and turned in a couple with n/a and a source link in the comments explaining what was wrong with those particular HITs, so I guess we shall see if they get rejected or approved.
Their format needed to be improved but the went in the opposite direction. Less information for us to try and figure out what the hell they want.
That's more what I meant. There seems to be a lot of non sense I had to return. Just jkhfsafsj as the class name. hopefully that gets fixed.
And they no longer include the URL of where the class number and name came from. So If you can't find the class you have no idea where the person got the info from. Before you could tell if it was from the wrong school or from a outdated catalog, but now....?
That is true. I forgot about that, but I like the new interface it just would be a lot better if they gave us a little more information to work with so we know what is the best practice.
I'm out there working on the "Find: Product Manufacturer and Device Type" HITs trying to feed some good info to you guys, but I think I'm the only sane one in the bunch. I don't know who else is working on the HITs.
May be the reason Rubin can pay so much on their HITs is that they hire morons to put together their HITs and pay them nothing...
I'm new to turking, so maybe my standards aren't the same as you guys but I found this to be pretty interesting.
Title: Use our demo and answer a short survey about your opinion of it
Requester: TerraFly Research [AFSTTVDS4JPAZ] (TO)
Description: Use our demo site and then complete a short survey about how usable you think it is
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90
[size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]