IMO since the directions said something along the lines of "based on the scenes", which I took to mean the provided thumbnails, the only reason we should ever have had to watch the video was if the the thumbnails were blurry. Then again, I only did ~20 and I may be remembering the directions wrong.
You should leave TO. I'm guessing they mass rejected people who had a certain amount of wrong answers, instead of actually checking each hit. I would Email them and send the reverse request. That's so wrong, I'd rather pay .35 then get 35 rejections.
I only watched one or two of the videos, like the ones that looked interesting. Or the ones that had just black boxes and didn't really show anything at all. I know a lot of people were posting at first if they were supposed to answer yes or no to the blurry part rather than if related, maybe they threw off other peoples answers.
I knew someone who looked very much like a famous person. She had been told about the resemblance so many times that she was sick to death of hearing about it. I'm sure he'll be polite but don't count on him being delighted.
I didn't feel like they were worth it to me either. I did Scott Yihs instead and now I want to have his babies.
Isn't that more than one sentence? LOL ound: It looks like they changed directions. I swear it used to say to use only one sentence to describe the monster. Maybe I'm tired and need to leave the forum. :laugh: Have a good weekend.
Title: short 2 to 4 minute survey - interesting and fun! Requester: The Wharton School [ABIUW8FBC3EE7] (TO) Description: please take this short 2-4 minute survey for $0.40 Reward: $0.40 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2J2GSCWY2AOO9BEQWPFOOQSHNAI116 [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size] Might be a repost, Great TO,
I'm confused about what they mean by not better than chance. They weren't a 50/50 split between right and wrong and there were quite a few that involved a judgment call. (If an adult and a child are in a video and the child is playing should say the "children playing" tag is OK?) I hope an email will prod them into going through yours one by one because I find it hard to believe you didn't get most of them right. IIRC on the ones I did most of the tags were appropriate.
small batch Title: Are These Locations The Same? Requester: Venue Quality [A14AT838CPSKA6] (TO) Description: Given the following locations, one must decide whether they refer to the same place. Reward: $0.01 Qualifications: Venue Quality Qualification is not less than 80 Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=20NENHMVHVKCOFQJ5EY4O79SQ1C24B [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]
Title: Survey on College Scholarships Requester: Lauren Davenport [A1T1AMQX7CMEBJ] (TO) Description: Give us your opinion about college scholarships Reward: $0.25 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2QPDNVP3TVOKDU3PAEP7XEO2J6W03C [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]
Title: Short Survey about Higher Education Requester: Lauren Davenport [A1T1AMQX7CMEBJ] (TO) Description: Share your views on higher education Reward: $0.25 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90, Location is US Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2KGW3K4F0OHO3RPANABO9L95LNK01O [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]
if this is the case, then it's either likely majority rules, they had some sort of classification system for these already that they're comparing it with, or they were just looking for statistically improbable result sets, like >99% 'yes' or 'no' (just an example)
I emailed them and offered a range of possibilities just to get my rejections reversed. I will pay them back, they can soft/hard block me, and I will never do their hits again. I just want my rejections reversed, and I want to know what the hell I did wrong.
I'm so frustrated! A requester says she put a HIT up, specifically for me and I can't find it anyplace. I feel like such a dunce!!
I did 99 of the Algorithm HITS and all were approved. All I can say is that I often took the time to look at the video. And a few times what I would have interpreted was different once I saw the video in action. Can they tell if the videos were ever clicked on?
This RnR batch is .06. Im going to do these instead. Gotta get that extra penny LOL Title: Identify whether these images are adult. (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised.) Requester: ProductRnR [A2BAP2QO7MMQI9] (TO) Description: Judge whether the image depicts an Adult image or not. Reward: $0.06 Qualifications: Quality score - AutoGranted on Request is less than 17, HIT abandonment rate (%) is less than 20, Quality score 1.3 - AutoGranted on Request is greater than 10, Quality score 1.1 - AutoGranted on Request is less than 13, Adult Content Qualification is 1, HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95, Quality score 1.2 - AutoGranted on Request is greater than 60 Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2J2GSCWY2AOOMOMJQ2FOMQSIPEJ11Y [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys [/size]