11/13/13 Random musings, Drama, oh and did I mention HITs!

Discussion in 'Great HITs' started by turklyfe, Nov 13, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Unleaded

    Unleaded User

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think their quals are really weird and don't ever improve. I did 500 hits of theirs or so in the past week. None of my scores improved in any category. 1 dropped slightly. It makes me think that eventually you will lose your qual, unless you're nonstop perfect, since there is no way to improve your scores, just decrease them.
     
  2. Turkoneup

    Turkoneup User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Title: Android Performance Test
    Requester: Jacopo Corbetta [A2L4YDUN9TIP2P] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    ***** 3.00 Communicativity
    ***** 3.67 Generosity
    ***** 3.00 Fairness
    ***** 3.00 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 3
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Interact with an Android emulator and answer some quick questions (no Android phone/tablet required)
    Reward: $1.50
    Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 80, Total approved HITs is greater than 50


    says 10 min, going in.
     
  3. LengAwaits

    LengAwaits User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    0
    I dunno if I can talk about this or not, but here goes:

    I fully believe that the RnR qual system is automated. They combat the need to monitor the HITs closely by planting certain "knowns" into their HITs/batches. For the Adult content HITs it comes in the form of those images that you end up seeing over and over again. They're basically ACs. If you mistag too many of them you lose the qual. I believe with the "identify unrelated images" HITs they actually devote an entire HIT to a quality check... that is to say, one out of every ~20 HITs is actually just a planted check that gets "scored".

    It's either that or some nightmareish automated majority rules system.
     
  4. buttlust

    buttlust User

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2013
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have lost the "Quality score" qualification twice now, and each time it came back after a few hours. I don't know why or really care, but that one does improve.
     
  5. elt

    elt User

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages:
    2,300
    Likes Received:
    139
    Title: Play a brief game and answer questions
    Requester: Adam Waytz [A1RPEITCVSBUQJ] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    ***** 4.54 Communicativity
    ***** 4.34 Generosity
    ***** 4.85 Fairness
    ***** 4.76 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 134
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: Play a brief game and answer questions - pays immediately
    Reward: $0.41 Time Allotted: 1 hour 30 minutes
    Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
    Hit available: ~1

    in case we are still doing writing warnings, here's one that deserves one.
     
    #45 elt, Nov 13, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 13, 2013
  6. Turkin Nappa

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,111
    Likes Received:
    174
    I have a working theory that it may be speed related. I notice my numbers going through the roof(well, 3 to 7 in a matter of 40ish hits) just by using a script and doing them quickly. Mind you this is only a guess but he did say he was going to find a way to filter scripts out if I remember correctly.
     
  7. TurkingBear

    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Messages:
    16,225
    Likes Received:
    5
    That's stupid. The hits are not worth it without a script. They shouldnt give a flying **** how we do the hits just that we do them right. Then again, RnR USED to have items preselected until people started to give them the shaft so they took that off. who knows? Maybe some people use the script and give them a shaft now too.

    But anyway hits arent worth it without the script.
     
  8. manzician

    manzician User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    11,715
    Likes Received:
    2
    Title: Give feedback about an online app for making big decisions - especially interesting for women (Cannot preview due to quals)
    Requester: Erik Larson [A1NN3FTZJJ1MFE] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    ***** 5.00 Communicativity
    ***** 5.00 Generosity
    ***** 5.00 Fairness
    ***** 5.00 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 5
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: The app helps you think thru a life decision, gives a simple answer, and gathers thoughts from a few close friends
    Reward: $2.50
    Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98, Location is US
     
  9. LengAwaits

    LengAwaits User

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    0
    That sounds very plausible.

    Seems like it may be both. Speed raises the SPAM qual and the various checks drop the Quality qual. I'm almost certain that the "Identify whether these images are adult." HITs do have a built in quality check, otherwise, why would the same 30-40 flaggable images appear over and over, all day, every day?
     
  10. Rielle

    Rielle User

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2013
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Figures he ups it 50 cents right after I finish the other one. Pfft.
     
  11. manzician

    manzician User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    11,715
    Likes Received:
    2
    The $2 one is still up so this one might be different. You should be able to do it unless it states otherwise. Try it out.
     
  12. admiraljohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2012
    Messages:
    2,581
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm pretty sure it's automated. I was doing a batch of their HITs (I wish I could remember what they were) on a Sunday when, with no warning, between completing one HIT and starting another I lost the qualification.

    I have no idea why and, true to their form, they ignored my request for clarification.
     
  13. Anisty

    Anisty User

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Alright guys I'm off to sleep. May the money be with you!
     
  14. BoxNinja

    BoxNinja User

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2013
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't this against mTurk TOS?
     
  15. Manduh

    Manduh User

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2013
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    0
    Welp, goodnight! I'm off to watch a movie then sleep.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  16. manzician

    manzician User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    11,715
    Likes Received:
    2
    Title: Questionnaire/Survey on Person Perception in Social Relationships- Looking for SINGLE participants between 18-45 year old (Cannot preview due to quals)
    Requester: Linda Siekel [A1OLWZXI6TAEUA] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    ***** 0.00 Communicativity
    ***** 5.00 Generosity
    ***** 5.00 Fairness
    ***** 5.00 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 1
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: The purpose of this study (in which you will be asked to answer to statements) is to learn more about person perception in social relationships.
    Reward: $1.50
    Qualifications: None

    Going in


    Edit:- Asks for Full name, DoB and other personal info.

    9 mins. Asks for email address as well.
     
    #56 manzician, Nov 13, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 13, 2013
  17. srdress

    srdress User

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    374
    Likes Received:
    0
    Title: Questionnaire/Survey on Person Perception in Social Relationships- Looking for SINGLE participants between 18-45 year old
    Requester: Linda Siekel [A1OLWZXI6TAEUA] (TO)
    Description: The purpose of this study (in which you will be asked to answer to statements) is to learn more about person perception in social relationships.
    Reward: $1.50
    Qualifications:
    Link: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/preview?groupId=2C4PHMVHVKCNU42SW0VJG9KS0D7350
    [size=-2]Powered by non-amazonian script monkeys ��[/size]​

    [​IMG]

    EDIT - beat to the punch. Sorry :/
     
  18. manzician

    manzician User

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2013
    Messages:
    11,715
    Likes Received:
    2
    Title: 7 min Survey about Consumer Reactions (Cannot preview due to quals)
    Requester: T.W. Consumer Research Center [AV08XZRO7QW6P] (TO)
    TO Ratings:
    [​IMG]
    ***** 5.00 Communicativity
    ***** 5.00 Generosity
    ***** 5.00 Fairness
    ***** 5.00 Promptness
    Number of Reviews: 2
    (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

    Description: In this survey, you will read a consumption scenario and answer some questions about it.
    Reward: $0.60
    Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not greater than 50, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
     
  19. nanaki254

    nanaki254 User

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    rnr spam can't be due to scripts. I have done the watermark hits with a script and got them to about 2-3 a minute and I still have a working qual for them since the last batch.
     
  20. admiraljohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2012
    Messages:
    2,581
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep, but most of us keep a spam email address on hand for HITs like this. It took me about 10 minutes and for $2.50 I'll deal with it. :)

    EDIT: And it's already approved. o_O
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page