Depends on the batch, I guess. I've done some incorrectly before and had no consequences and I've had others where I was sure I did it right and got some rejects anyway. Many of them depend on how the majority of people decide is right which may or may not be actually true. I guess that's sort of a non-answer but it's the best I can give.
Lovely. I'm just supposed to cut and paste examples of emotional and informational support and then rate them. But the Groups rating (Carnegie Mellon) stinks. I guess they reject quite a bit..... I've done about 30 or so. If I let them go now, I'm sunk (I only have 200 hits).
17 min for me. Title: Writing, linguistic abilities, and food products Requester: Stefanie Salmon [AHXM7VY7NLRQ7] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 1 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Writing task, linguistic ability task and food product task Time: 60 minutes Reward: $2.10 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95
Title: Writing, linguistic abilities, and food products Requester: Stefanie Salmon [AHXM7VY7NLRQ7] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 1 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Writing task, linguistic ability task and food product task Time: 60 minutes Reward: $2.10 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95 sounds dreadful but I'm a sucker
I was wondering that as I was doing another group yesterday - and trying to figure out if that was a wild turkey (and could fly) or a commercially raised turkey (which cannot). Cripes.......
Title: A quick 10-Minute survey about everyday interactions Requester: Duke Center for Behavioral Economics [A14RDIKJG0V5TD] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.73 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.27 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.61 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.55 Promptness Number of Reviews: 113 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: We'd really appreciate your response and will compensate you well! Time: 60 minutes Reward: $0.35 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US Title: Personal attitudes Requester: Hagop Sarkissian [A2G7WKMIYWG9XP] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 0.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.17 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.75 Promptness Number of Reviews: 8 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Short, fun, easy survey! Time: 60 minutes Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
Title: Entertaining Choices - Great questions, great pay, easy money Requester: Fun Behavioral Pollster [A1QR9OJZTV7MZJ] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.00 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.52 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.22 Promptness Number of Reviews: 34 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Simple questions about a variety of topics Time: 60 minutes Reward: $0.20 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95, Location is US
The TO primarily complains about the length of time they take to pay. If you are past your 10 days and have the full 3800 HITs/day to work with, you could always go HAM on this batch, and then follow-up with going HAM on a "good ol" batch that is readily known to approve within a couple of days. That would pad your numbers in case you had any blowback. But really, there are only a few rejections mentioned in the TO. (You gotta read the comments, a lot of people don't know how to properly use the numeric rating system, which messes it up for the rest of us. And really, people shouldn't ding anything other than the 'Fast' category for long auto-approval times because those are indicated on the HIT preview, before you even accept the work. Dinging a requester on 'Fairness' over a long approval time that they told you about before you took the task isn't really fair either.)
This one took me about 17 minutes earlier... one part was a wee bit hard for me tho that early, so can probably be done quicker.
Title: Consumer Research Survey (~10 min.) Requester: David Hendricks [A1SH12CS04JI1J] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.89 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.43 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.76 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.65 Promptness Number of Reviews: 41 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Make several judgments on consumer products Time: 60 minutes Reward: $0.65 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 99, Location is US Title: Academic Research Survey (15 minutes) Requester: Illinois CDL [A3VLHKAC0QY2EC] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.86 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 2.43 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.14 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.90 Promptness Number of Reviews: 48 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please take the linked survey and enter a confirmation code. Time: 2 hours Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 60, Location is US