Did this a few hours ago, took less than 20 minutes and already approved, pretty easy. Title: Graphs/Charts Comprehension Test | PANDA Requester: Sukwon Lee [A3DRZHM52W5PGJ] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity★★★★★ 2.00 Generosity★★★★★ 0.00 Fairness★★★★★ 0.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 6 TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Please solve 54 multiple-choice questions about graphs/charts within 23 minutes! Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is US
Did anyone brave this? Title: Survey on Moral Judgments Requester: Lauren Smith [ A1F0801WB1VMH4 ] (TO) TO Ratings: No Reviews on Turkopticon (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: This is a 10-12 minute survey by researchers at the University of Pennsylvania. You will be asked to read short anecdotes about someone performing a moral or immoral act and respond to a few questions. All responses will be confidential. Time: 60 minutes Reward: $1.00 Auto-Approves: 3d 0hr 0m Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90; Location is US
LCNS - Complete a task about uncommon uses for everyday objects I did send a message. I guess we'll see what happens, but he left his reasoning in his feedback, and I'm not really expecting him to budge. I had to come up with unusual uses for an obscene amount of everyday objects, and I guess I wasn't supposed to use the same answer for more than one object. I feel I made an honest effort, so it's pretty lousy of him to reject me on a HIT that I spent so much time on for about $6 an hour.
Quick 1 question $0.15 Gov Research Panda https://www.mturk.com/mturk/previewandaccept?groupId=3XKJYHBF2Q1O0AG8UQ64LQPDJAS9S1
Same here. It was horrible. At first I did multiple for each then realized I shouldn't. Was afraid I'd get rejected but it got approved.
I think I had a few that were similar but I was afraid of the same thing so I tried to word them differently.. it was mind numbing and monotonous and not worth the pay at all..
Woman who can't even speak proper English: "It's ignorant as hell!" Makes me glad I don't live in Chicago. I would not take a civics lesson from someone who can't use proper grammar, throws homophobic insults and just acts generally ratchet. Videos like this will gain more supporters for Trump. She should become Trump's mascot.
His TO is really mixed. Some got angry messages back while others said he was communicative, helpful and friendly. I guess that depends what you say to him. Hope you get yours reversed.
"the instructions clearly states that you should provide unique, object-specific responses while you kept recycling same answers (e.g., weapon) for different objects. Good luck in the future! Thank you." I'm sorry, but you keep showing me giant wrenches and hammers and such, I'm going to continue to think, "Bludgeon someone with it."
Was this the $4 one? Mine from yesterday was paid and I definitely repeated uses. I remember because I wrote about using things for "limbo". Edit: You were allowed to "omit" or "skip" 10 or less objects. Not sure if you could use that to appeal the rejection in case you didn't avail yourself of that option. Just an idea.