Screw you Pavel the Red Sox are taking this year To a firesale at the trade deadline because they suck
Title: Answer four questions about your opinion of online forums - 20 seconds or less - reward is guaranteed Requester: Seyed [A2V1EGSPDSV15S] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.17 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.50 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.57 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.21 Promptness Number of Reviews: 15 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion about your activity in online communities Time: 10 minutes Reward: $0.05 Qualifications: Masters has been granted, Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95 Personally I can't stand them. NERDS TO is fine, accidentally mass rejected and reversed everybody, some people updated rage reviews some didn't
Title: Transcribe a short audio clip Requester: Lassana [A2X9KNKU4H45XN] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Transcribe a short audio clip Time: 3 hours Reward: $4.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted Didn't actually realize this requester wasn't named Lasagna until I posted it
For OCMP you can always hope for another qual batch to go up and if it does you can do it. Also occasionally if they didn't qual enough people they will put up a qual you can do with less than 90% and if you do well on that they will raise your qual.
Ian Twardus Answer a survey about non-professional investor decisions $2.50 Approved - Pending Payment if that helps anyone
Just found 12 noteworthy errors in Motocross Magazine in spite of the TO warnings. At least 5 of them were straight up wrong, so hope that one works out!
This survey I'm doing has a lot of A or B answers to how you handle things and one is "When I have a boring assignment" and one of the options is giving up. Bro it's a masters HIT, doing boring assignments is how I got here