Say whuh? Debate Question: Do you believe a country's national security also includes its history and mythology?
I've started my own virtual currency. It's based on smiles, which I hope you all get from this gif. That's a great kind of wealth! Good night!
Oh, the event is over. Well, I can't really complain about 2-1, I should have gone 3-0, but I made a blunder and lost myself the 3rd game. We don't learn without mistakes though, so it certainly taught me to be more careful.
Title: Socialist Party of America position on Syria Requester: iSideWith [A2FOWQ8GGKCQUX] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.36 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.15 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.80 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.85 Promptness Number of Reviews: 20 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please choose the best answer(s) for the Socialist Party of America position on Syria Time: 60 minutes Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: American Politics is 1 do at your own risk. there's several up by the same requester, qual required, easy and instant.
Hey folks. I wanted to remind you guys that I did not promise never to reject any hits. I promised not to hard-block anyone whose work we didn't like, and also to only soft-block people whose ratings weren't very useful to us. I did not, however, promise not to reject work that was very obviously worthless. We only handed out rejections to a handful of workers in the past several days, and that's out of many hundreds who have worked on our hits this week. These workers (including the guy posting on reddit) massively abused our hits, and it's not even borderline. The guy rated our jokes in an average of 3 seconds each, assigning literally random ratings to our jokes, including the same jokes he rated multiple times. I stand by what I've always said: if you speak English, actually read our jokes, and rate them honestly, you absolutely will get all of your hits approved. I haven't seen a single case yet where we rejected someone who was taking our work seriously. Actually, it's not that surprising that we occasionally get workers who think they can whiz through our hits. They probably think "oh hey, this is just a subjective question, so I can answer without actually reading, and I can say whatever I want." Yes, it's subjective, and yes, you can absolutely rate honestly, but no, you can't answer randomly and arbitrarily quickly -- we'll catch that! So thanks to the 99% of our workers who take our tasks seriously and give us honest ratings. We appreciate it
Welcome to the hoot owl shift. We're about to change over to a new day, so you might want to post this tomorrow but not on the front page. Probably won't get seen. Front page is for silly gifs and such.
We thank you for the open communication channel, hopefully the work you get from Mturk Workers is satisfactory for your objectives with the work.
Title: Search: Keywords on Google.com (US) Requester: CrowdSource [A2SUM2D7EOAK1T] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.06 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.14 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.38 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.52 Promptness Number of Reviews: 459 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Copy and paste the most relevant result for each provided keyword. Time: 16 minutes Reward: $0.08 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 200, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 85, Location is US