Title: App Sales Study #2 | PANDA Requester: Julie Fischer [AKEXDIXZPJAT3] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 1.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.33 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 3.67 Promptness Number of Reviews: 14 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: - Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 194 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90;Location is US
@aatonturk-- "The cat was not entirely whale enough to enter the mouse hole." What does that mean? Looks like a typo.
A lie, but still less than a minute. Title: ONE CLICK SURVEY | PANDA Requester: Jennifer Schmit [A3CFQ8ASQMT43D] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 5.00 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 3.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 2 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Give us your opinion! Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.35 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 100;Masters has been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90;Location is US
you never worked at a job where you train your replacement? not sure why so many believe that OCR is more accurate or cheaper though they are getting progressively better several people doing the same receipt is cheaper than OCR with one or more mistakes then what would you do? how could you know there were no mistakes? wouldn't "someone" or "something" have to check them? all of these companies either use OCR or train OCR using your data none of them would rather use MTurk
I haven't looked at OCR in a few years, but it totally sucked dick at the time. I doubt that it's gotten THAT much better.
No, I've never had to train my replacement because I was irreplaceable. In the case of these receipts, you don't even need OCR. The diff between them is obvious to any naked eye, and much faster and more efficient than what they're doing. Not exactly the same case as the p9r's, where you have to transcribe. And we could be making mistakes too.
Around 2 min Title: Stigmatized STIs WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised. Requester: Angela Listy [A1M2H0HAEXONBY] (TO) TO Ratings: ♥♥♥♥♥ 4.26 Communicativity ♥♥♥♥♥ 4.21 Generosity ♥♥♥♥♥ 4.40 Fairness ♥♥♥♥♥ 4.97 Promptness Number of Reviews: 66 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please take this survey about your thoughts on different sexually transmitted infections. Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.38 Qualifications: Location is US, Adult Content Qualification is 1
Computers don't have eyes. That's the issue. We have to train them (hence, the field of Machine Learning) to be able to figure this stuff out.
Batch with reading, some are more than others Title: Categorization Requester: Zhe Yu [ADZNWINRR3HWF] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Choose the correct category Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 500 Reward: $0.05 Qualifications: Masters has been granted
She had another one earlier today. It wasn't her usual hilarious one tho. I think today isn't her quirky day.
I do all of her surveys when I qual for them. I really find them fun (not so much the one earlier today though). Some of them are slightly crazy, but they pay well. I actually thought she was trolling the first few times I saw her hits posted LOL!!!!