Looking for HITs? 5/18 Where's my food Wednesday

Discussion in 'Great HITs' started by Flora, May 18, 2016.

?

Pick one... (first choice/second choice/third choice)

  1. Clinton/Sanders/Trump

    18 vote(s)
    12.3%
  2. Clinton/Trump/Sanders

    3 vote(s)
    2.1%
  3. Sanders/Clinton/Trump

    52 vote(s)
    35.6%
  4. Sanders/Trump/Clinton

    17 vote(s)
    11.6%
  5. Trump/Clinton/Sanders

    7 vote(s)
    4.8%
  6. Trump/Sanders/Clinton

    23 vote(s)
    15.8%
  7. No

    26 vote(s)
    17.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jawz

    jawz User

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,293
    Likes Received:
    0
    #562 jawz, May 19, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: May 19, 2016
  2. Monica

    Monica User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    #563 Monica, May 19, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: May 19, 2016
  3. nanaki254

    nanaki254 User

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's not how it goes..

    http://mturkforum.com/showthread.php?34364-Making-the-daily-Great-Hits-thread

     
    #564 nanaki254, May 19, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: May 19, 2016
  4. db42

    db42 User

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    6,173
    Likes Received:
    0
  5. Monica

    Monica User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. nanaki254

    nanaki254 User

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would be fine with it if they actually said something about it, when I posted twice about the thread making

    once at 2hr30min prior, asking if anyone wanted to make the thread, and saying if no one called it by 30 minutes prior, then I would make it.

    Then 30 minutes prior, I posted that 'since no one called it, I would make the thread.'

    No one corrected me, or said anything about making the thread.

    That's what i'm not cool with.
    It would have been fine if they had given a small mention that they were making it, even minutes before, instead of just posting the thread without saying anything.
     
  7. Monica

    Monica User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Understandable. I think going forward there may be a different system put in place to avoid any sort of complications, or frustrations, for users on either side of this situation. Again, though, I think I'm going to leave both of them up and let the users decide which to use for today.
     
  8. nanaki254

    nanaki254 User

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    How is there a frustration? If they want to make the thread, then they would just say they would make the thread. There really shouldn't be a frustration as anyone is able to call it at any time.

    I'm not in charge and never was in charge. Only if no one called it by 30 min prior, that I would say that I would make the thread so that *someone* will make it.

    It's really a dick move when someone creates a thread to spite someone out of it without saying anything.

    Even Digitalfox has the courtesy to say when he's going to make the thread.

    I've been open about this multiple times. It seems like hardly anyone even cared to bring up any other systems other than one or two other people.

    The way it is now, anyone can call it at any time. If no one calls it for a particular day, I would say I would make it 30 minutes prior. How would that frustrate people?
     
  9. Monica

    Monica User

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2014
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you want to take this to PM to avoid clustering up this thread any further, if not that's fine and I can reply here.
     
  10. nanaki254

    nanaki254 User

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    7,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    k i'll pm you
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page