Title: Survey about news story (3 mins.) | PANDA Requester: Lucinda Atkinson [A1MVUMLFCSM760] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion about a brief newspaper story (less than 3 minutes) Time: 3 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.25 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US 2 minutes
Title: Select the higher quality color image | PANDA Requester: gray2color-user-study [A1XM92W6II6TNG] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 0.00 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 3.33 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 5.00 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.75 Promptness Number of Reviews: 8 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: - Time: 20 minutes Hits Available: 37 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90; Location is US 4 minutes
Title: A 5-minute survey about judgments and decisions(~ 5 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Job Krijnen [A27KMKH3VMQQTQ] (TO) TO Ratings: ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.50 Communicativity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.68 Generosity ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.95 Fairness ☢☢☢☢☢ 4.94 Promptness Number of Reviews: 40 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: We are looking for people to participate in this short survey about judgments and decisions. Time: 40 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Exc: [37871-41953] has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90; Location is one of: US 4 minutes
My first guess was only 2% off of the estimate actual break down. Apparently I remember something from my economics class.
Title: A short survey on work related issues | PANDA Requester: jca694 [A1P0ZM5C8F1HNO] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 3.91] [Fair: 4.80] [Comm: 3.67] [Fast: 4.62] Description: This is a survey on work related issues. Please do not participate if you have participated in the survey from me yesterday (5/5). Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 5 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Location is US; pretest has not been granted; 3 minutes.
Title: personality and opinions | PANDA Requester: Kathy Berenson [A3SZW0K7BOID1K] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.38] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fast: 4.93] Description: Give us your opinion about personality traits and answer questions about your own personality. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90; Total approved HITs is greater than 50; Location is US; 5 minutes.
Woot. Just hit a milestone. Took just about a month and a half. Lets see if I can get the next 1k in a month.
I see HITs up for $9.40 if you qualify. This is an unusual screener. Once you are done with the screener and the qualification test...the qualification is auto granted but wait about 2 minutes before your qualification HIT is open to you. EDIT: I see rejections for the $9.40 surveys. Probably should avoid. The screener however approved. Title: Prescreen for HIT | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Work Skills First, Inc. [A21OD3Q4LP2ABZ] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.78] [Fast: 3.73] [Comm: 3.00] [Fair: 4.07] [Reviews: 37] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $14.10/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 100% of 1] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Auto Approval: 1 minute Time: 5 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.20 Qualifications: Previous Participant has not been granted ; Total approved HITs is greater than 500; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 98; Location is US;
I wonder what they are looking for in the qual. I only got a score of 2, but the lowest score necessary to complete a HIT is 4.
With 2, you should have gotten the qualification. Wait few minutes and you'll see one of them open up for you. But reading the TO, people have gotten rejected for taking it. From the looks of it, looks like it took them over an hour.
Mine is 2 too and one of them opened up for me. It should for you too. But after reading the TO, I'm avoiding it. Might be an error with the rejection based on the history since it's current but who knows. Someone mentioned the $20 HIT in yesterday's thread asking the same question. No one else apparently has done it.
5-6 years ago that was the norm. HITs were paid multiple times an hour it seemed. This is interesting and a possible reason why they are making some changes. https://www.geekwire.com/2017/amazon-adds-10m-users-payments-service-escalating-paypal-rivalry/
Well the rest of my HITs are approaving at the normal slow ass rate. I've been on here since September of 2011 and I always remember them going slow I remember though we didn't have to move them once a day to the payments account and when they approved they just went straight there which was nice (though what I didn't like back then was having to have $10 to send to my bank account cause back then I was just starting out and a $10 day was a good day!)
[looks to see what wonderful HITs are available] Ramesh Radhakrishna Manuvinakurike wants me to " Please tell us how the photo can be improved and made better". Sorry, for 10 cents I can only improve it or make it better. Not both. Chris Callison-Burch's quest to find someone who speaks both Czech and Hindi continues. Ooh, ten pennies from Lucas to "QUICK, EASY- Pick the best Google search result". Quick. Check. Easy. Check. Truth in advertising for once. [gives up and goes back to playing games]