LOL. Is he really that short? I never paid that much attention. But let's be clear, you. I am soooo not voting for Rubio. But he is proving to be less insane than some of the others. And that's saying a lot.
I'm Team 60 despite all the hits looking like they had obvious answers. Not sure what I messed up on that one.
It's a new one, categorizing requests. Panda from Lucas https://www.mturk.com/mturk/previewandaccept?groupId=3KHO6UOMJ9OHUT6SPDFKDXAUW0VPBZ
It's called "Classification of user intention". I'm not sure if pandaing will help, since they only posted like 15 or so. Maybe if they post again.
Title: Tagging + Information Extraction of Conversation Data Qual Requester: OCMP75 [A2YSXPKEGZFA1H] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.00 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 2.17 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 6 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Tagging for Gold Data Time: 30 minutes Hits Available: 78 Reward: $0.05 Qualifications: Advanced Work Qual has been granted
$3 Brandeis Social Interaction and Motivation Lab Survey is utter bullshit. At least 40 mins for $3 and that's pretty much racing through it and giving far from ideal data. (which is only to be expected TBH given that pay rate...) If I wasn't almost done with this bubble shitstorm I would have returned it. Just giving others a warning. Edit: LOL RIP their data. It didn't give me a code so I won't submit it but my responses got logged for them. Oopsies.