XD that was a blast, thanks all! Sorry it was so short, but it's super late here. I'll be back tomorrow night, probably doing the same thing, hopefully a little more sober XD
i honestly thought this was going to be a picture of you back in the day paul, i am disappoint and i was all ready to bust out my zygote pictures
Anyone else ever get irked by how crap the AMT search function is? Only see 10 results per page, no way to exclude requesters (so you sift through 10+ empty pages of requesters you've blocked via script), etc. Just curious, are there any tricks? Some secret syntax that works with AMT? Scripts that could fix this?
XD I'll try to figure out how...I guess I need to buy a webcam XD And one of these days, I'll have to engage my mic. Maybe on Friday.
OMG SHUT UP Something keeps dinging in my room - 4 hours and I still have no idea wtf it is. It's driving me nuts. It better be something that runs on batteries and those batteries better run out soon.
click faster imo the search function is really good on mtwerk, just add an auto approve filter and a couple of others and we gucci
Oh I got all that down. Clicking speed isn't an issue so much as the 2-3 seconds per page and general annoyance at sifting through so much crap. AMT search technology is from the 90s. Sort-by is the only feature it has.
a general block list would be nice I guess, sifting through vidangel/speechink on reward highest can get annoying and many others on the other filter settings. Before vidangel I had memorized speechinks usual page amount and just skipped those pages directly and didnt bother spending seconds going through each page. but overall I do like the current filter on mtwerk, its pretty efficient once you understand it
Nah it's old school as hell. I should be able to block Oscar and Crowdflower and any other crap requester from my searches completely. We've developed ways to make it work for us but it's missing feature most search platforms have had for a decade.
I've sent them a number of suggestions, all ignored. main amazon search hasn't changed much over the years either. they are not really interested in how long it takes to find what you want. maybe they think you will inadvertently find a hit you didn't think you wanted to do and impulse do it? an option page where you can exclude requesters better keyword sorting so you can exclude transcriptions via checkbox a checkbox for master hits? what use is it for the rest of us, how about an exclude master hits a sort of requesters you've worked for before. I doubt there is anyone working on improving the search. hope I'm wrong. as long as enough hits get done fast enough why should they care? in fact, forget all the above. I have enough competition finding hits as it is... would be nice if you could select the sort at the start of the search, I have some bookmarks. search reward least, 50c, 1.00, 0.05 is good after sorting reward most. alternating with creation time newest or most hits available.
no emails back? I just actually sent them a bug list of stuff I have found over the last couple months one game breaking bug, I really hope they fix it
Nope. as 8 bit bear would say. " making pebbles." Im also contemplating transcription. Anything for a newb to tinker with?