If I didn't read it, how could I give a description of its content? And if he tries that, I'll do what I've done before. Contact the IRB. One email is nothing for me to send. The headache is on the other end... Also the article was not exactly a very complicated thing to understand. So a fast reader should not have needed to take any longer on it than I did.
I took around 15 mins I guess. I didn't time it. The only thing I could think is that I did it in Chrome and have Turk open in FireFox. Not sure if that would mess up survey software and make it look like a took only a few seconds. It shouldn't do that though. I accepted it in FireFox, did it in Chrome and then pasted the code in FireFox. But maybe it's a software issue. Regardless of that, it isn't my fault. Does anyone know if switching between browsers would cause a false time alert like this? I find that really hard to believe though.
The other guy who did it said 15-18 IIRC. And I know I was not much off from that. So if I do not get an acceptable response, I'll let the University deal with it. That almost always works.
Did you even read my post, Arby? Not sure if you're just trolling or not. Read what he wrote. It answers your question.
It's automated, but triggered by something specific. The requester wouldn't have that message as a catch-all for any mistake. Personally, I'd be shocked if they didn't reverse it based on TnL's message, unless they're total assholes.
And the automated response specifically mentions *time*. If he wrote about a missed AC (as other rejections have), I wouldn't be wasting people's time posting about it.
Title: Online Consumer Reviews and Decision Making Requester: Ryan Langan [AQEWVMOFYOMDO] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 5.00 Communicativity★★★★★ 4.88 Generosity★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 24 TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: After reviewing an online review for the purchase of a laptop computer you will be asked 15 questions (some w/subparts) to get your thoughts. Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 96;Location is one of: CA, US;Total approved HITs is greater than 50
Seeing as how I even gave a CNN-tonight-worthy corollary for the article (in addition to summarizing it), I would actually relish writing an email to his IRB if it isn't overturned. Clearly I would much prefer being paid and having it overturned, but I'm not exactly the roll over and take it type. I love me a good fight.
Me too. I just submitted the second one. Took a screenshot because apparently rejections are in the air tonight.
Anybody got a time on the $3 junk food HIT? One is for females and one for males. It's in my queue but I haven't started it yet.
Not sure wtf is going on my panda keeps going off but when I click on the hit I just get this Invalid URL parameters Your request was not completed successfully.