That wasn't me. I got the screenshot from TO and Reddit. I never did her HIT. Not sure in this case. Complaining about a rejection or block is one thing. Even an account suspension. But being notified that hate speech is being disseminated by requesters who pay to use your platform is not a good look. Especially when a corporation is notified of this and then does nothing.
Title: Answer an academic survey (35-45min to complete) | PANDA Requester: Conversation Lab UIUC [A1O6SK9CKK1P7W] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.50 Generosity ★★★★★ 0.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 0.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 2 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: This survey is a series of written questions that is designed for workers who speak English as a native (first) language. Please do not accept this hit twice. Time: 4 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $4.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 1000;HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95
Great idea people. Post it elsewhere to attract more attention to this platform. The more competition for us, the better!
Nope. But I cringed when I read what the requester wrote. Most normal people would have done the same.
Typical. How many minorities have you oppressed today, bigot? Back on subject, These Andrew Scherer's hits are pretty good. Shame it wasn't a bigger batch.
Requester just sounds like an internet warrior. Bad ass online but total punk ass in real life. Most of the younger generation are like this. That guy was probably mad because his ProActive starter kit didn't deliver today.
Qualtrics is killing me on this Paso Lab survey. "Sorry, an unexpected error occurred." I've got to be near the end and it won't let me off the damn page. Anyone have any suggestions beyond start over and hope for the best?